Behavioural
Economics
Session 1
Joshua
Foster
Agenda
About Me
Joshua Foster, Ph.D.
I am always happy to help!
Course Objectives
Course Themes
Course Implementation
Evaluations & Assessments
Class contribution |
30% |
Midterm examination (October 22 from 2:00PM-5:00PM) |
35% |
Group project (December 2 or December 4) |
35% |
|
100% |
Case: An exercise in choice architecture.
Let's jump right into it.
Group 1 | Armaan Sandhu |
Peyton Kou |
Newt Chen |
Liam Geddes |
Mathis Zanzucchi |
Madie Erauw |
Group 2 | Andrew Feng |
Jack McDonnell |
Emma Jewell |
Andrew Yang |
Junsoo Pak |
Ricky Chiu |
Group 3 | Nienke Toonen |
Cheuk Yee Chen |
Aya Aherdan |
Johann Abraham |
MK Dao |
Miriam Youssef |
Group 4 | Sadiyah Sajjad |
Kyle Kim |
Ryan Mitchener |
Laura Amelie Cordeddu |
Caitlin Trinh |
Gabriel Sinha |
Group 5 | Emily Tao |
Aidan Zia |
Peter Guo |
Grace Cousineau |
Jackie Yuan |
Jessica Luo |
Group 6 | Cole Smith |
Uttej Mannava |
Nathan Mark |
Oren Joffe |
Andrew Korne |
Michael Wei |
Group 7 | Carrie Malkin |
Mallery Fischer |
Elaine Lin |
Otis Ding |
Ben Goring |
Sarah Smith |
Group 8 | Abhi Ravipati |
Amelie Pirotte |
Rongrui Mao |
Tessa Fois |
Clemence Valet |
Elliott Wardle |
Group 1 | Hooman Mohammadi | Adam Ramkissoon | Alessandro Panetta | Fiona Fan | Carol Xu | Oliver He |
Group 2 | Evan Scrivener | Kieran Amoroso | Jackson Su | Sarinah Goolam | Francesco Rende | Sudipta Sarkar |
Group 3 | Ethan Gilhula | Zi Li | Harvey Zhu | Braeden Stewart | Jasmine Gu | Florence Rouvez |
Group 4 | Sarah Shao | Sanaa El Fatihi | Gabe Evans | Michael Thien | Jackey Lai | Cole Purdell-Lewis |
Group 5 | Joseph Spadafina | Emmett Koles | Keegan Smith | Hanisha Dhoofar | Andy Hwang | Isabella Valdez |
Group 6 | Nicholas Giangregorio | Connie Xu | Travis MacKay | Joanne Shao | Xin Zeng | Maurice Ma |
Group 7 | Hannah Jeon | Laith Amad | Stefano Ruggieri | Jack Hogan | Vanessa Chen | Ryan Pin Harry |
Group 8 | Steven Grano | Simon Hungate | Andrew Ko | Yusuf Nissar | Emma Bradacs |
Small Group Task
Take the next ten minutes and construct your own version of the tax letter with the members of your group.
Summary of Ideas
Who here thinks the letter should:
Experimentation
Randomization:
Random assignment of subjects ensures that there are no inherent differences between the groups answering the different questions. The differences in behaviour can be attributed solely to the different questions.
Experimental Manipulation:
To learn what difference something makes in people's behaviour, we vary that one thing between subjects.
Results.
Social norms helped. There was 5% increase in the likelihood delinquent taxpayers submitted a payment in the weeks following their letter -- the difference of millions of pounds in revenue each year.
Key takeaways.