Behavioural
Economics
Session 11
Joshua
Foster
"... day-to-day fluctuations in the profits of existing investments, which are obviously of an ephemeral and nonsignificant character, tend to have an altogether excessive, and even an absurd, influence on the market."
- John Maynard Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (1936)
Team | Members | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Speed | Joyce Liu | Sam Lu | Emily Qin | Lena Tang Qiu | Junaid Rana | Makenzie Shirley |
Knowledge | Palina Radzioshkina | Joey Lisser | Lauren Um | David Hascal | Audrey Ghilain | |
Confidence | Noah Roddis | Max Leibovich | Shane Gitlin | Jamie White | Kate McCallum | Kayla DeAngelis |
Courage | Isabel Yuan | Saniya Niyoosha | Declan O'Neill | Siqi Man | Wenqi Shen | Ryan Smith |
Insight | Amandine Prioux | Mara Lerf | David Kang | Patrick Westdal | Hailey Tang | Theo Kalff |
Wisdom | Anthony Pham | Yiling Yang | Jane Wang | Orianna Lui | Tej Sharma | Sue Han |
Energy | Gauri Pasbola | Katie Werner | Jennifer Bitton | Kayla Whitnell | Tristan Gilchrist | Tanner Spadafora |
Strength | Brandon Jones | Chloe Bissell | Emily Kim | Gavin Barclay | Timothy Haluk | Nunu Mequanint |
Simulation instructions.
How it works.
How you make money.
How you make money (cont.).
How you make money (cont.).
Some important facts about this market.
To summarize:
What is the rational pricing strategy for "Stock X"?
How can we relate this simulation's results to mistakes in naturally occurring asset markets?
One more MobLab Simulation.
Pick a number $X\in\{0,1,2,3,...,100\}$.
Objective: get closest to $\frac{2}{3}$ of the group's average.
Example: If you believe $\bar{X}=100\Rightarrow X^*=67$.
What is the rational way to play this game?
Level-k reasoning.
Individuals devise strategies according to their beliefs about others' rationality.
What are the primary assumptions regarding how financial markets operate?
1) | |
2) | |
3) | |
Equity premium puzzle.
Equity returns outperformed bond returns by 4% on average from 1871-1993 (Campbell and Cochrane, 1999).
From Mehra and Prescott (1985):
Understanding an $\eta$ of 30 with a gamble.
You would be willing to pay 49% of your wealth to avoid a 50% chance of losing 50% of your wealth.
How might a behavioural economist explain the Equity Premium Puzzle?
Terrance Odean studied individual investors:
Entire Year | December | Jan-Nov | |
PLR | 0.098 | 0.128 | 0.094 |
PGR | 0.148 | 0.108 | 0.152 |
Difference | -0.05 | 0.02 | -0.058 |
t-stat | -35 | 4.3 | -38 |
Apply Prospect Theory. What is the reference point?
What is the source of loss aversion?
Investors make certain behavioural mistakes due to a variety of biases/heuristics.