Global Economy, Markets and Strategy

Joshua Foster at Ivey

Agenda

  1. Case: Pricing the EpiPen: This is Going to Sting.
  2. Fairness in Markets with Price Discrimination

What are some options for Heather Bresch in this case?

1)2)
3)4)
5)6)

What risks do you see with each option here?

As per the press release, Mylan:

  1. Offer savings card, up to $300.
  2. Doubling eligibility for assistance (family of 4 making less than $97,200 get it for free).
  3. 700,000 free pens to schools.
  4. Direct-to-consumer sales to reduce costs.

Then, offers a generic brand version of the same product for $300 (50% price cut).

Are the ethical considerations of price discrimination different in this case than in the previous case?

Should Mylan be allowed to set a price of $\$$600 in the US and a price of $\$$85 in France?

How does Mylan justify this?

"We do subsidize the rest of the world...and as a country we've made a conscious decision to do that. And I think the wold's a better place for it."

What does this subsidization argument imply?

What degree of price discrimination is Mylan engaging in?

Simple example: Coke wants to sell cans of soda it has already produced to up to four people. Therefore, MC=0.

PersonWillingness to Pay (WTP)
Albert$1.00
Becca$1.50
Clair$2.50
Danny$3.00

If Coke can only charge one price, what should it choose?

If Coke can identify Albert & Becca have lower WTP and offer them a non-transferable coupon, what should they do?

Notice, profit max's out with first degree (i.e. perfect) price discrimination: charging each consumer their WTP.

Three pricing strategies:

  1. No discrimination, one price, half participate.
  2. Third degree, two prices, all participate.
  3. First degree, four prices, all participate.

Which of the three pricing scenarios likely made the most consumers happy?

Notice how important it is for full market participation when we switch a Coke for an Epi-pen...

Distributional social preferences.

The degree and nature of how individuals care about the outcomes of others, relative to their own outcomes.

  1. Appears to be relevant to price discrimination.
  2. An important issue that transcends pricing.
  3. Example: Wal-mart attempting fee-based express checkout lines.

Break-out Group Discussion.

  1. On our Learn coursepage, you'll find some discussion questions in the module for this session.
  2. When time is up, we'll come back and discuss general impressions.

Key takeaways.

  1. Pricing across various market segments (e.g. geographically) is a common method of price discrimination.
  2. Distributional social preferences can limit the extent to which this strategy can be implemented.
  3. How a firm frames the reason for price differentiation is a critical consideration for managing these social preferences among consumers.