The Devil is in the Details
Exploring the impact of design choices in sexual harassment e-trainings and their effect on perceived messenger integrity and training effectiveness.
Study motivation
Researcher-Practitioner Collaboration
Consulting Project(s) $\Rightarrow$ Questions about Characters/Format
Collaboration on Training Design $\Rightarrow$ Custom Manipulation Materials
Question
How do design choices in sexual harassment e-trainings affect the perceived integrity of the messenger and the effectiveness of the training?
We experimentally explore:
Why this is important
Productivity loss from sexual harassment is estimated to be $\$$2.62 billion in 2018 ($\$$1053 per victim).
Experimental design
2x2x2 between subjects
Sample of 210 undergraduate subjects (26/cell)
Commercial training product
Constant trainer profiles
Session procedure
Survey Measures
Theoretical motivation: media
(Naive) Hypothesis 1
SH training effectiveness will be greater for e-training with a high media rich format (e.g., video-based) than for e-training with a low media rich format (e.g., text-based).
Theoretical motivation: trainer integrity.
Rich media is associated with greater trust and perceived integrity of an information source.
Hypothesis 2
SH training effectiveness will be mediated by perceived trainer integrity.
Media rich format (e.g., video-based) $\Rightarrow$ greater perceived trainer integrity
Gender-occupation incongruence
Two types of legally qualified messengers for SH training:
Male HR and female lawyers are more likely to be perceived as "disrupters" and therefore given lower perceived integrity.
Hypothesis 3
The interaction between messenger gender-occupation incongruence and media richness is mediated through perceived messenger integrity to affect training effectiveness outcomes.
Summary
Closing thoughts